Secure coding in C and C++ for medical devices

CYDCp_MedDev
4 days
On-site or online
Hands-on
C
C++
Healthcare
Medical devices
Developer
labs

34 Labs

case_study

17 Case Studies

Audience

C/C++ developers developing medical devices

Preparedness

General C/C++ development

Standards and references

SEI CERT, CWE and Fortify Taxonomy

Group size

12 participants

Outline

  • Cyber security basics
  • Memory management vulnerabilities
  • Memory management hardening
  • Common software security weaknesses
  • Using vulnerable components
  • Wrap up

What you'll have learned

  • Getting familiar with essential cyber security concepts
  • Learning about security specialties of the healthcare sector
  • Identify vulnerabilities and their consequences
  • Learn the security best practices in C and C++
  • Input validation approaches and principles
  • Managing vulnerabilities in third party components

Description

Your application written in C and C++ works as intended, so you are done, right? But did you consider feeding in incorrect values? 16Gbs of data? A null? An apostrophe? Negative numbers, or specifically -1 or -2^31? Because that’s what the bad guys will do – and the list is far from complete.

The most important concern in the healthcare industry is naturally safety. However, once isolated medical devices became highly connected to date, which poses new kinds of security risks: from exposing sensitive patient information to denial of service. And remember, there is no safety without security!

Handling security needs a healthy level of paranoia, and this is what this course provides: a strong emotional engagement by lots of hands-on labs and stories from real life, all to substantially improve code hygiene. Mistakes, consequences, and best practices are our blood, sweat and tears.

All this is put in the context of medical devices developed in C and C++, and extended by core programming issues, discussing security pitfalls of these languages.

So that you are prepared for the forces of the dark side.

So that nothing unexpected happens.

Nothing.

Table of contents

  • Cyber security basics
    • What is security?
    • Threat and risk
    • Cyber security threat types – the CIA triad
    • Cyber security threat types – the STRIDE model
    • Consequences of insecure software
    • Constraints and the market
    • Regulations and standards
      • Healthcare data protection regulations
        • HIPAA
        • HIPAA and security requirements
        • GDPR
      • Regulations for medical devices
        • Regulations and standards for medical devices
        • ANSI/CAN/UL 2900
        • ISA/IEC 62443
        • NIST Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security
        • Other standards
    • Cyber security in the healthcare sector
      • Threats to medical devices
      • Attackers and motivation
      • The problem of legacy systems
  • Memory management vulnerabilities
    • Assembly basics and calling conventions
      • x64 assembly essentials
      • Registers and addressing
      • Most common instructions
      • Calling conventions on x64
        • Calling convention – what it is all about
        • The stack frame
        • Stacked function calls
    • Buffer overflow
      • Memory management and security
      • Vulnerabilities in the real world
      • Buffer security issues
      • Buffer overflow on the stack
        • Buffer overflow on the stack – stack smashing
        • Exploitation – Hijacking the control flow
        • Lab – Buffer overflow 101, code reuse
        • Exploitation – Arbitrary code execution
        • Injecting shellcode
        • Lab – Code injection, exploitation with shellcode
        • Case study – Stack BOF in boot file handling of MQX DHCP client
      • Buffer overflow on the heap
        • Unsafe unlinking
        • Case study – Heap BOF in VxWorks DHCP options parsing
        • Case study – Heartbleed
      • Pointer manipulation
        • Modification of jump tables
        • Overwriting function pointers
    • Best practices and some typical mistakes
      • Unsafe functions
      • Dealing with unsafe functions
      • Lab – Fixing buffer overflow
      • What’s the problem with asctime()?
      • Lab – The problem with asctime()
      • Using std::string in C++
  • Memory management vulnerabilities
    • Some typical mistakes leading to BOF
      • Unterminated strings
      • readlink() and string termination
      • Manipulating C-style strings in C++
      • Malicious string termination
      • Lab – String termination confusion
      • String length calculation mistakes
      • Off-by-one errors
      • Case study – Off-by-one error in VxWorks TCP ‘Urgent Data’ parsing
      • Allocating nothing
  • Memory management hardening
    • Securing the toolchain
      • Securing the toolchain in C and C++
      • Compiler warnings and security
      • Using FORTIFY_SOURCE
      • Lab – Effects of FORTIFY
      • AddressSanitizer (ASan)
        • Using AddressSanitizer (ASan)
        • Lab – Using AddressSanitizer
      • RELRO protection against GOT hijacking
      • Heap overflow protection
      • Stack smashing protection
        • Detecting BoF with a stack canary
        • Argument cloning
        • Stack smashing protection on various platforms
        • SSP changes to the prologue and epilogue
        • Lab – Effects of stack smashing protection
        • Bypassing stack smashing protection
    • Runtime protections
      • Runtime instrumentation
      • Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR)
        • ASLR on various platforms
        • Lab – Effects of ASLR
        • Circumventing ASLR – NOP sleds
        • Circumventing ASLR – memory leakage
        • Heap spraying
      • Non-executable memory areas
        • The NX bit
        • Write XOR Execute (W^X)
        • NX on various platforms
        • Lab – Effects of NX
        • NX circumvention – Code reuse attacks
          • Return-to-libc / arc injection
        • Return Oriented Programming (ROP)
          • Lab – ROP demonstration
          • Protection against ROP
  • Common software security weaknesses
    • Security features
      • Authentication
        • Authentication basics
        • Multi-factor authentication
        • Authentication weaknesses
        • User interface best practices
      • Password management
      • Authorization
        • Access control basics
        • Case study – Broken authn/authz in Conexus protocol for Medtronic devices
        • File system access control
          • Improper file system access control
          • Ownership
          • chroot jail
          • Using umask()
          • Hardening the Linux filesystem
          • Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)
          • Case study – Insecure file permissions in McKesson Cardiology 13.x / 14.x
  • Common software security weaknesses
    • Security features
      • Authentication
      • Password management
        • Outbound password management
          • Hard coded passwords
          • Best practices
          • Lab – Hardcoded password
          • Case study – Compromising Abbott FreeStyle Libre sensors via NFC
          • Protecting sensitive information in memory
            • Challenges in protecting memory
            • Heap inspection
            • Compiler optimization challenges
            • Lab – Zeroization challenges
            • Sensitive info in non-locked memory
  • Common software security weaknesses
    • Input validation
      • Input validation principles
      • Denylists and allowlists
      • What to validate – the attack surface
      • Where to validate – defense in depth
      • When to validate – validation vs transformations
      • Output sanitization
      • Encoding challenges
      • Unicode challenges
      • Injection
        • Injection principles
        • Injection attacks
        • Code injection
          • OS command injection
            • Lab – Command injection
            • OS command injection best practices
            • Avoiding command injection with the right APIs
            • Lab – Command injection best practices
            • Case study – Shellshock
            • Lab – Shellshock
            • Case study – Command injection in GE Healthcare MobileLink
      • Process control – library injection
        • Library hijacking
        • Lab – Library hijacking
        • Case study – DLL injection in Vyaire Medical CareFusion Upgrade Utility
      • Integer handling problems
        • Representing signed numbers
        • Integer visualization
        • Integer promotion
        • Integer overflow
        • Lab – Integer overflow
        • Signed / unsigned confusion
        • Lab – Signed / unsigned confusion
        • Integer truncation
        • Lab – Integer truncation
        • Case study – WannaCry
        • Best practices
          • Upcasting
          • Precondition testing
          • Postcondition testing
          • Using big integer libraries
          • Best practices in C
          • UBSan changes to arithmetics
          • Lab – Handling integer overflow on the toolchain level in C and C++
          • Best practices in C++
          • Lab – Integer handling best practices in C++
      • Files and streams
        • Path traversal
        • Lab – Path traversal
        • Path traversal-related examples
        • Path traversal best practices
        • Lab – Path canonicalization
  • Common software security weaknesses
    • Time and state
      • Race conditions
        • Race condition in object data members
          • Case study – State confusion in VxWorks IPNet stack
        • File race condition
          • Time of check to time of usage – TOCTTOU
          • TOCTTOU attacks in practice
          • Lab – TOCTTOU
          • Insecure temporary file
        • Potential race conditions in C and C++
          • Race condition in signal handling
          • Forking
          • Bit-field access
          • Using ThreadSanitizer (TSan)
    • Errors
      • Error and exception handling principles
      • Error handling
        • Returning a misleading status code
        • Error handling in C
        • Error handling in C++
        • Using std::optional safely
        • Information exposure through error reporting
      • Exception handling
        • In the catch block. And now what?
        • Empty catch block
        • Lab – Exception handling mess
    • Code quality
      • Code quality and security
      • Data handling
        • Type mismatch
        • Lab – Type mismatch
        • Function return values
          • Unchecked Return Value
          • Case study – #iamroot hash migration bug
          • Omitted return value
          • Returning unmodifiable pointer
        • Initialization and cleanup
          • Uninitialized variable
          • Constructors and destructors
          • Initialization of static objects
          • Lab – Initialization cycles
          • Declaration and allocation issues in C
          • Declaration and allocation issues in C++
        • Unreleased resource
          • Case study – Unreleased resource in VxWorks TCP ‘Urgent Data’ parsing
          • Unreleased resource – Synchronization
          • Unreleased resource – Files
          • Array disposal in C++
          • Lab – Mixing delete and delete[]
      • Object oriented programming pitfalls
        • Accessibility modifiers
          • Are accessibility modifiers a security feature?
        • Inheritance and object slicing
        • Implementing the copy operator
        • The copy operator and mutability
        • Mutability
          • Mutable predicate function objects
          • Lab – Mutable predicate function object
      • Memory and pointers
        • Memory and pointer issues
        • Pointer handling pitfalls
        • Alignment
        • Null pointers
          • NULL dereference
          • NULL dereference in pointer-to-member operators
          • Case study – NULL dereference in VxWorks IGMP parsing
        • Pointer usage in C and C++
          • Use after free
          • Lab – Use after free
          • Lab – Runtime instrumentation
          • Double free
          • Memory leak
          • Smart pointers and RAII
          • Smart pointer challenges
          • Incorrect pointer arithmetics
      • File I/O
        • Working with file descriptors, structures and objects
        • File reading and writing
        • File access functions and methods
  • Using vulnerable components
    • Assessing the environment
    • Hardening
    • Case study – Supply chain attack on Alaris Gateway Workstation
    • Vulnerability management
      • Patch management
      • Vulnerability databases
      • Lab – Finding vulnerabilities in third-party components
  • Wrap up
    • Secure coding principles
      • Principles of robust programming by Matt Bishop
      • Secure design principles of Saltzer and Schroeder
    • And now what?
      • Software security sources and further reading
      • C and C++ resources

Pricing

4 days Session Price

3000 EUR / person

  • Live, instructor led classroom training
  • Discussion and insight into the hacker’s mindset
  • Hands-on practice using case studies based on high-profile hacks and live lab exercises
Customized Course

Tailor a course to your preferences

  • Send us a brief description of your business’s training needs
  • Include your contact information
  • One of our colleagues will be in touch to schedule a free 45 minute pre-training consultation

Inquiry

Interested in the trainings but still have some questions? Curious about how you can customize a training for your team? Send us a message and a team member will be in touch within 24 hours.

This field is required

This field is required

Send us your phone number if you prefer to discuss further on a call

This field is required

This field is required

This field is required

This field is required